WE, the People:

The fundamental premise is that WE have the choice of self determination, and the responsibility that emerges with it.  We have the right and the responsibility to make a decision to take charge of our lives, its associations, and "adjacents."

We acknowledge and understand that the confusion and travesty that passes for civilization or society is the work of incompetent criminals cloaked in a false legitimacy, and their attempts at creating cultures have only resulted in various forms of criminal enterprise. They have no clue on how to construct a small group, much less advance a culture or a civilization.

You and I could solve our neighborhood problems over coffee in one afternoon, and we could "reverse engineer" any vision into its components and solve the many issues that appear to plague us.  This outlook is in direct contrast to today's convention that someone or something other than yourself is responsible for the condition you find yourself in today.

The BUCK stops here. 

We posit as the basis of our endeavors that WE cause our destiny.  We are not victims, nor do we submit or surrender to anyone or anything.

We therefore emancipate ourselves here and now, and move forward to become knowledgeable, informed and able, so that we can advance the cause of freedom for ourselves and others.

This network is set up currently to effect action by helping members to become informed, sharing our successful and positive actions, recognizing strengths and areas that need change and improvement in ourselves and our abilities, and utilizing the necessary tools to ADVANCE our Freedom and Responsibility, and applying our knowledge to effect positive change.

The old adage that you cannot get blood out of a rock, does not apply here.  We recognize the barbarism and savagery that passes for "civilization."  

Essentially all of us have observed that we live in a metaphorical "Jurassic Park."  We don't necessarily want to tame it. We want to live in it and survive, prosper and win. 

We will harness it and thrive.

Citizens Militia of Maine

Donald Trump, Jeff Sessions, Democrats, Illegal immigration, and the Slave Trade.

What a clever way to hide the buying and selling of humans in the slave trade, i.e., human trafficking, by calling it: "illegal immigration."

The Slave Trade is big business, and like the Drug Trade, it has found a lucrative market here in the U.S.  Until it is confronted for what it really is, merely addressing this as "illegal immigration," will not bring this criminal enterprise under control, much less end it.

For years you have been bombarded with the theme that illegal aliens are pouring over our southern border, and that they are coming here, because there is such a dire situation in their home country, and the prospect of employment in the U.S. is a magnet for them and so they are coming here in droves.

That's the propaganda, the lie, and the cover-up story.  The truth is simple:  It is slavery, international human trafficking.  It is the selling and buying of humans.

Cartels and criminal syndicates entice, recruit, coerce, kidnap, capture, house (imprison), transport and deliver humans for use as sex slaves, drug smugglers, and cheap labor.

American and international corporations, the Chambers of Commerce, and Americans who hire ("buy") the cheap labor are in collusion with the cartels and crime syndicates that traffic in Humans.

You already know how this criminal enterprise is affecting your neighborhoods:   Schools and school districts require more money and resources; cities and towns require more money for more resources and infrastructure; it's affecting wages, employment, quality of life issues, welfare, food stamps, and medical services, etc.

Politicos who benefit from an intentionally altered demographic are willing to betray their nation by "buying" the votes of captives for political power and influence. In fact, when they realized that the slave trade (illegal immigration) might not be enough for their nefarious purposes, they then resorted to importing "refugees."

Currently the political entity most invested in the slave trade is the American Government, and by default, American citizens.  YOU have been made an accomplice to this travesty, if not willingly then by tacit consent.  Politicos use your inaction, your disinterest, apathy, lack of awareness, and use propaganda, political maneuvering, lying and coercion against you in order to continue this criminal enterprise.

It looks like your saving grace to rid yourself of your involvement is to hold Donald Trump's feet to the fire on this and related issues.  It requires a firm hand from you, your determination, your action, and your ability to hold accountable those that you have elected to rectify this atrocity.

See it for what it is: The Slave Trade. When you do, you will more easily move to abolish it.

The Glaring, Pathetic Lie About Russian Hacking

The story and  hysteria about the Russians hacking Democrats' computers is a distraction from the proverbial "other shoe" that has not yet dropped.

That undropped shoe is whether or not Hillary Clinton will be prosecuted for the alleged crimes she has committed.

We all know her misdeeds. No need to expound upon them here.

There is, however, a more glaring lie about computer hacking (Russian or otherwise) that is being perpetrated against Americans. We can explain that lie by confronting the truth about it, and that truth is this:

You cannot hack a computer via the internet, if it is not connected to the internet.

Additionally, the only way to break into a computer to access its contents, if it is not connected to the internet, is by physically accessing that computer.  You must have a password, and at that point you must print out or download the data you are accessing into a disc or a flash drive, or some other portable storage device, and then you must either transmit that information or carry it out with you when you exit the place where the computer is located.

This must be done PHYSICALLY, obviously, since without an internet connection to the target computer, it cannot be hacked.

It's that simple.

The big SECRET is that no one in government, it appears, has enough common sense to disconnect or unplug or by some other means, cut the connection from computers to the internet.

It also appears as though all of America's secrets and anyone who has access to them is "hackable."

If your computer is connected to the internet, then it can be hacked.  If you do not want to be hacked, disconnect your computer from the internet.

I have two computers.  One is connected to the internet, the other is not.  I don't keep anything on the computer that is connected to the internet that I don't want anyone else to have.

In light of how hacking is such an issue, this information, I assure you is of value in the zillions of dollars.  It is offered here at no cost for the purposes of national security and the "greater good."

The details of how to disconnect from the internet, the Pentagon or some other mega-agency, involve solving a considerable number of logistical problems, but these problems all have solutions.

I can assure you that this fact will be attacked as simplistic, and even idiotic, but I can also assure you that this is so only because there is much to cover up about how the secrets of your nation have been compromised to friend and foe.  I can assure you that this has been done deliberately and that money, privilege, and favor have been traded for the booty.

And there you have the reasons for all manner of distractions.  The wealth and the power and position of your nation have been sold to the highest bidder.  And so have its secrets and access to them.

Therefore, "it was the Russians."  "Keep them busy with the Russians, the electoral college, the price of beans in China."

Focus on the other shoe.  Slam it into the ground. HARD.

The Myth of Obama's Executive Orders and the So Called "Bypass of Congress"

The Government Criminal Organizations (GCO), in this case, the Washington version, including the White House, the Congress, and the Courts, act in collusion and in conjunction, and coordinate their actions.

Any individual exceptions are few and very rare, and even then, if they are one of the "radicals" they take full advantage of waging an aggressive offense, knowing full well their measures, legislation, projects, programs will never see the light of day, much less have any chance of actually becoming a law that will then be enforced; similarly with the pretense of Constitutional protections.  So they can rant and rave and "filibuster," and have no effect, get lots of publicity, and yet do nothing, and yet because of the show, they are not held accountable.

Today the national ruse, the joke of the union, is that Obama is somehow BYPASSING Congress by issuing Executive Orders to, ostensibly, enact rules to limit gun sales and gun ownership.  The clown makes a sham of the Office of the Presidency by shedding tears for his cause, but the continuing farce, the lunacy, is the narrative that he is somehow BYPASSING Congress in issuing his executive orders.

Of course there are "guffaws" and "ahems" and choking noises from Rino's and Conservatives alike, apparently outraged at Obama's actions.

But please ask. Please look:  How can Congress be BYPASSED, when they are totally and completely in the tank for Obama?  Congress has just passed an Omnibus Bill funding anything and everything Obama wanted, "in order to not appear like they were shutting down the government."

Well, this just gets them totally off the hook, doesn't it?

Can you just hear the deals behind closed doors?  Obama says:  "Hey you fund everything I want, and I'll give you outrageous executive orders to get you off the hook."  Can you just hear one of them, possibly John Boehner, pleading with Obama, "Hey, I really get off on crocodile tears.  Could you cry for the cameras?  That would Soooooo humanize you."  And of course, can't you just hear Obama saying, "Hey, I'll put on a dress and dance on the podium if you want, but if all you want is tears, you got 'em!"

Obama cries, and "bypasses" with executive orders, and Congress expresses fake outrage, and upset, and guess what?  YOU, (WE) are cooked. Soaked.  Bilked. Shafted.

So GOOD MORNING fellow citizens.

At this point we have NO government: there is only a criminal racket occupying  Washington and that criminal enterprise controls a mega-ton of state, county, and municipal governments.

Would that we at least had Articles of Confederation, at least something that would address our basic needs as "the governed" as laid out in the Preamble to the Constitution.  We have not even that.

Instead  we have  a criminal racket that couldn't solve its way out of their own toilet if they had to. Look at the product; look at the result. It's supposed to be a "government BY THE PEOPLE ... for the people.

What are "they" actually producing? What results from their "efforts?"

The lined pockets of criminal thugs dressed in suits, sitting in plush offices paid for by the plunder of those they are supposed to serve; severe deterioration of the social fabric; bribes from foreign governments and special interests; legislation of favored status for themselves and their "benefactors" and co-conspirators.

How do we solve this?

We refuse the pretense.  WE BYPASS the facade.  We  Build a culture, a representative government from the ground up: On our block; in our neighborhood; in our town; in our district;  WE have to be willing to confront, handle and control the "government mafia" and create our own self interest right on our own sidewalk.

We start here and expand outward. We take our immediate  territory, not with tyranny, but with sanity and determination, and THEN we hold it, and then we expand from there:  One block at a time; One ranch at a time;  one neighborhood at a time; one street; one village; and once we have enough reclaimed areas that we control, THEN we create a NETWORK, and thus we build the civilization.

Do not be fooled.  There is no "civilization"  "out there."   There is something that appears to be a society,   but that is merely a chaotic entity covered with social veneer, and a very thin one at that.  Mostly there is a network of dysfunctional confusions pretending to be actual organizations, and yet, there are those who compete to control those confusions.

All that bogus, pretended society must be BYPASSED and a FOUNDATION, however basic, however small, however necessary, must be built one brick at a time to create a more perfect union, establish justice, ensure our individual and social tranquility, provide for our common defense, and secure the blessings of Liberty for ourselves and our posterity.

There will always be criminals and scoundrels, but they need not be a part of our culture nor do we need to be part of theirs.

Obama Reads the "News" In Order To Know "How To Respond?"

Sean Davis, Co-founder of "The Federalist" (@ thefederalist.com) has a thorough report on how the New York Times has edited "a mistake" made by the Obama administration.  According to Davis the action by the NYT had "caused some major media waves:"

"...The story, which was written by reporters Peter Baker and Gardiner Harris, included a remarkable admission by Obama about his response to the recent terror attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, California ... By Friday morning, however, the entire passage containing Obama’s admission had been erased from the story without any explanation from the New York Times..."

Davis quotes CNN's Brian Stelter, who reported:  "...In his meeting with the columnists, Mr. Obama indicated that he did not see enough cable television to fully appreciate the anxiety after the attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, and made clear that he plans to step up his public arguments. Republicans were telling Americans that he is not doing anything when he is doing a lot, he said..."

The way Davis calls it is this:

"... The version of the New York Times story that was published early Thursday evening indicated that Obama knew he was out of touch with the country on terrorism, and he thought that was due to not watching enough television. Obama critics immediately pounced on the stunning admission from the president, expressing shock that he would claim that a lack of TV time was the real reason for him not understanding Americans’ anxiety about terrorism..."

Davis continued in his column that the passage containing Obama's admission was gone as of Friday morning, and then displayed the passages as they went through several revisions, including several changes in the headlines of that article, and included the following:

"...The original headline when the story was first published was 'Obama Visiting National Counterterrorism Center.' Less than two hours later, the headline was 'Obama, at Counterterrorism Center, Offers Assurances On Safety.' Then the headline was changed to 'Frustrated by Republican Critics, Obama Defends Muted Response to Attacks.' Two hours later, the headline was once again revised to 'Under Fire From G.O.P., Obama Defends Response to Terror Attacks.' The most recent headline revision, which accompanied the deletion of the passage where Obama admitted he didn’t understand the American public’s anxiety about terrorism, now reads, 'Assailed by G.O.P., Obama Defends His Response To Terror Attacks.' ..."

The action by the New York Times is as just as absurd, if not more, than the Original statement by Obama.  THAT is what IS the news.  Deliberately or "unconsciously" the media, the "conservative" camp, as well as the socialist shills for Obama, are overlooking what is disappointingly obvious to many Americans, and that is, not the attempt to hide Obama's failings via the editing of the reporting of his actions, but the actions (or statements) themselves.

Specifically THIS:  What sort of person has to rely on cable news, or any reports for that matter in order to feel a certain way about a particular incident.  Obama is described as being "out of touch," but I submit that there is much more there to ponder than a mere lack of information.

WHO needs to be told by someone or something else how to act?  14 Americans were brutally slaughtered by psycopathic terrorist killers. Who even measures the amount of anxiety needed as a response?

THIS person is your President Today.  We have heard constantly how Hillary Clinton's campaign operatives have been working overtime to make her seem more real, more appealing to her audiences.  Is it because she too, like the President lacks the social empathy that is natural to other human beings?

Do both of these personalities lack a particular trait that makes everyone else "normal?"

Would you care to mention what trait that is, and what psychological disorder this points to?

[Original Story Source:  Sean Davis @ The Federalist)

WHAT IF?

The following is a "What If?" example to make a point about the President's pitch for gun control in the wake of the San Bernardino Terrorist attack:

Let's suppose there was a well-guarded  base in Afghanistan, which security, a handful of terrorists managed to breach, and before being caught and/or killed, managed to kill a dozen soldiers within the base.  The base Commander, knowing full well the intentions of the enemy terrorists, and communicating that to the troops within the base, then announces that he wants anyone in possession of any kind of weapon to turn in that/those weapons, and he wants base police to prevent the troops from obtaining any additional weapons.  The Commander does this as the enemy sends out a public announcement to the base, stating that they are going to launch further attacks upon the base.

The rationale the Commander advances as a justification for "gun control" is that the terrorists will not be able to shoot or kill anyone if there are no guns to be obtained from those that possess the guns on the base.

What do you think the troops within that base will perceive the state of mind of their Commander is?  On whose side do you think the troops will believe their Commander is on?

What that hypothetical Commander should do is to make sure that every one of his soldiers in that base is fully armed, and is fully trained in using the arms that they possess.  Further that Commander should ensure that any of his troops that do not have a weapon,  immediately obtain a weapon, and that they receive the best training in the use of those weapons as soon as they receive them.  The Commander should then order defensive and offensive drills, and then launch attacks on the terrorists BEFORE they are able to attack his base again, and he should annihilate the terrorists and any danger of attack by any other enemy entities, in order to ensure the security and safety of the base.

Now, apply this "hypothetical" to the San Bernardino terrorist attack and the actions of the President in its aftermath.

I should point out that we are into the second week, since our homeland was attacked.  It was an act of WAR against our country.  DAYS after the mass murder it was already too late.  Hell should have been unleashed immediately upon the headquarters of the cowards in Syria and Iraq that congratulated the terrorists for their actions in San Bernardino.  Their headquarters in Raqqah should have already been wiped out, and a systematic annihilation of anything left of that regime should have by now been systematically underway.

Instead  those that were thrust into cowardice and hand-wringing by the attack, including those in the media, are targeting our own people in this country, are advocating for the surrender of our arms, demonizing those who dare to speak against the enemy, rabidly criticizing anyone who wants to take aggressive measures to protect our borders and our national entry points, and in the case of our "Attorney General," she has threatened to violate our first amendment rights, outright stating that we now have no freedom of speech, unless she deems it so, and that we cannot write or say anything against anyone of a particular religion, and that if anyone does, they will be prosecuted for "hate speech."

Pardon me, but where exactly would the Attorney General incarcerate thousands upon thousands of Black Muslims, who rant and rave with "hate speech" against "White Devils?"  Would she immediately arrest Louis Frarrakhan and his followers?  Or was she favoring one religion over another, "just because" she is the Attorney General.

To sum this up: The President should have launched an all out attack against our terrorist enemies.  He should have issued an executive order for the applicable agencies to issue weapons  immediately to any Americans who are able to use them, and made training available to them.  The applicable agencies should then be organizing community security events to teach people what to look for to detect terrorism and terrorist attacks.

In other words, he should be taking any and all actions necessary to make safe our nation and its borders.

Instead, what do we have?

INVASION (Part 2) What To Do...

This is Part 2 of the previous article titled "INVASION."  Part 2 is part of an article that is re-written and updated, published back in July of 2014.

In case you missed it... click HERE for part one of the article "INVASION"


Illegal immigration, amnesty, Executive amnesty, or whatever the current name is for the INVASION that the U.S. is currently experiencing, is effectively today the Obama Administration's continued creation and maintenance of an underclass of people, a culture, not just an economic class, but a culture that is subject to exploitation, economically and politically . Illegal Immigrants, trafficked by cartels are being sold as indentured servants to the Obama Administration in exchange for billions of dollars for the political and commercial benefit of Socialist Democrats and Socialist Republicans.

This is "human trafficking" at its worst, and amounts to nothing less than a slave trade.

Illegal immigration, or "amnesty" by Executive Order, which, by the way was issued a severe set-back by the Appeals Court this week (and yet is being appealed by the Obama Administration to the Supreme Court), is an act of collusion in human trafficking by the Obama regime with international human traffickers, and the regimes of the governments of origin of those being trafficked.  The politicos of the "countries of origin" get paid in two additional ways:  When the money that the illegal aliens make in wages here is sent back to the the country of origin, it "helps" those economies.  Our "foreign aid" also becomes bribes to perpetuate the circle of crime and corruption, to fund, if not another wave of illegal immigrants, certainly a continual flow of them to this country.

It is a lucrative business, this slave trade.  It is a sugar-coated crime cake baked by ruthless sociopaths, who also pick from the lot, victims for the sex-slave trade, and in some cases the "slaves"  are used as "mules," to carry, smuggle, and deliver drugs.

In the past the slave trade was the craft of pirates and smugglers.  It still is, but now, governments are in partnership and in collusion with the cartels.

The Socialist Cult, the Democrats and the Liberal Republicans, are willing partners here in the U.S., when they take campaign donations from the vested interests that assist and advance this criminal operation, specifically Big Business interests, along with the chambers of commerce who believe they would benefit from cheap labor.

Conservatives have been trumpeting about this invasion for years.  Author and political activist Michelle Malkin authored a book titled exactly that: INVASION.  Here's an excerpt of a 2002 review of her book by Mark Krikorian, then Executive Director of the Center for Immigration Studies:

"... she lays out the rogues' gallery of groups responsible for our inept immigration system: politicians pandering to Hispanic voters by promoting illegal-alien amnesties; ethnic pressure-groups trying to get drivers licenses for illegal aliens; local governments declaring themselves sanctuaries for illegals; universities seeking ever more foreign students, even if they're in the country illegally, and resisting any measures to track such students; the American Immigration Lawyers Association, "a powerful lobbying network against all major immigration reforms during the past four decades"; and, perhaps worst of all, the corporate rope sellers, like the travel and tourism industries (which seek to speed foreigners into the U.S. at any cost), or banks eagerly seeking the deposits of illegal aliens, or employers of cheap immigrant labor, or border-town chambers of commerce.
Malkin's discussion of these "profiteers" suggests a topic for her next book -- a more in-depth examination of the individuals, organizations, and industries pushing for weak immigration controls. In Invasion, she outs the corporate miscreants and their libertarian fellow-travelers - but we also need to know more about the leftists, the people who love immigration because they hate America. This information would be especially important for those conservatives who, like the president himself, have been duped with fairy tales about shifts in the Hispanic vote toward the GOP. This hoax is actually being peddled by those on the Left who realize that mass immigration is, in truth, an enormous boon to the Democratic party. I think Malkin would do a great job digging into the background of open-border activists like Jeanne Butterfield; it's already known that before becoming executive director of the abovementioned American Immigration Lawyers Association, Butterfield was director of the Palestine Solidarity Committee, a Marxist group linked to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine..."

No one has mega-phoned the crisis of illegal immigration and its impact on the U.S. more than Conservative radio personality, Michael Savage, whose theme has been consistent for decades as: "Borders, Language, Culture."

For years the Socialist Cult has attempted to marginalize and to discount, defame, denigrate and discredit anyone who was warning Americans, not only about the false, imminent illegal immigrant humanitarian issue, but also of a current, continual, and massive flow, an invasion of illegal aliens across our borders into the U.S.

The most recent prominent perpetrators of the ridicule, as was mentioned earlier in part1 of this series of articles, are Governor of Iowa John Kasich and former Governor of Florida, Jeb Bush.

Today's catastrophic  "humanitarian" crisis is but a desperate effort by the Socialist Cult's primary proponent, the Obama administration, which has already gone under for the third time, and is drowning in the murky waters of a multitude of scandals.  The desperate dolts perceive this as an opportunity to save themselves with a distraction that takes News air-time and print space away from the already scant reporting of the Obama and Hillary scandals by their propagandist media.  They have seized this as an issue to position Conservatives negatively.

Their strategy is to position themselves as the champions of the poor, helpless, oppressed, and homeless "undocumented workers."  The apparent "rescuers" of the poor illegal immigrant victim "children," have gambled that they are going to be viewed as knights in shining armor riding to the rescue of millions of refugees.

Actually the Socialist/Liberal Democrats/RINO Republicans are inadvertently promoting the message that the illegal immigrants are for sale to the highest bidder.

And therein lies a strategy.

Conservatives can and should counter them with the message that immigrants have been duped today and have been always, lured here under false pretenses with the aim of being sold commercially as cheap labor, cheap union lackeys, and and politically as cheap votes; that illegal aliens  are considered by the Socialists HERE, as they are considered by the Socialists, from whence they came: as political and economic slaves and pawns.

Presidential candidate, Donald Trump has been partially right in confronting the INVASION crisis, but he has not had the strategy with which to counter effectively the propaganda impact of the pretended Socialist "rescuers."

It would do the invaders a great deal of good to learn that they have been duped.  How this is communicated to them, either with a large scale leafleting campaign, or some other kind of media (in their language, of course), might not be yet determined, but this as part of the strategy is vital.

Additionally there must be a message to Democrats and Liberal Republicans, and any who is in favor of "amnesty," or legalization.  That message must be that they are in collusion with human trafficking and the slave trade.

Conservatives must not agree to be labeled racist, must in turn identify Democrats and Liberal Republicans as the enslavers, and therefore, as the racists that they are, and Conservatives must deliver this message with determined diligence.

Since the Socialists will have a vote-ready constituency that they will attempt to bribe with an array of benefits, the least one can do is to create a doubt in the minds of those "amnestized" about being willing participants in their own enslavement, and in the minds of those who are willing to assist in that enslavement.

Perhaps some, if not all, will then turn on their slave-masters.  There have always been those that prefer the security of their chains to the contest of Liberty, but some slaves will opt for Freedom.

Candidate Trump, and anyone that agrees with him in his stance on "immigration" is being positioned as a racist.  Since he apparently has a huge following, that amounts to a huge number of people being labeled as racists. .

Add to this situation the current attempt to create a false narrative on college campuses with regard to "racism," and this gives you an inkling of how desperate the Socialists are, and how anxious they are about the issue.  Trump's popularity and rise in prominence with the immigration issue is making them so anxious, that they have resorted to attempt a drastic strategy of elevating "political correctness" into a national movement, most probably to shut any opposition down to any Socialist issue, but particularly, this one of "illegal immigrants."

By the way, there IS a precedent for this phony movement now seemingly aborning on college campuses.  That movement was popularized in China during the reign of Mao Tse Tung: Chairman Mao.  It was called the "cultural revolution" and it was largely carried out by students.  And that movement, by the way, was highly discredited, and so was Mao, because of it, BY THE COMMUNISTS themselves, after Mao died.  The Socialists know this, but they also know that during the cultural revolution the perpetrators were responsible for shutting down any opposition to Mao's socialist/Marxist policies at the time.

Only a determined attack against the Socialists will stop their plotting and deceit  and their efforts to "transform" America.

Their ruse must be exposed and turned against them.